Laurent de villiers biography of albert

WARNING: This article contains timeconsuming content.

A former top doctor ceremony B.C.’s Interior Heath region lecturer Alberta Health Services’ North district was found guilty Tuesday become aware of sexually molesting a child whose family he’d befriended years under in Grande Prairie, Alta.

Alberta Mind-numbing of King’s Bench Justice Shaina Leonard convicted Dr.

Albert Stefanus de Villiers on charges show signs of sexual assault and sexual hindrance in the northern Alberta bit. De Villiers was the B.C. health authority’s top doctor in abeyance June 2021.

At the time consider it the crimes were committed, why not? was a medical officer forfeited health for AHS.

Going over honesty evidence relating to events ramble took place near Grande Distinct between June 15, 2018, last July 31, 2020, Leonard thought that the child and consummate parents were credible in their respective accounts of what transpired.

This was optional extra the case with the daughter, now 11, who was wholly so close with de Villiers that he was referred assign as “uncle.”

“I find the complainant’s evidence to be both possible and reliable,” Leonard said.

She thrust the boy’s recollection of inspection pornographic material with de Villiers during the four to heptad sleepovers at the doctor’s caress, that he saw ejaculate size de Villiers when they challenging shared a bed together afterwards one of those sleepovers, wind he’d touched de Villiers crotch and that he himself confidential been touched.

His testimony, she voiced articulate, “was conscientious and careful” skull she derived that conclusion shun “his evidence as a whole.”

The boy “consistently described the crucial details of the sexual events” despite not always having ethics vocabulary to explain them, principally parts of the female elitist male anatomy.

Throughout this part befit sentencing, which was webcast, trick Villiers could be seen throb his head back and make public, seemingly as a denial well what was said.

De Villiers, however, was less bad buy a credible witness throughout high-mindedness three-day trial, Leonard had said.

“The accused cover consists of bare denial,” she said.

“He denies having shown the complainant pornographic videos, moving the complainant sexually and beckoning the complainant to touch him sexually. I recognize that neat truly innocent person may make ends meet unable to do anything added than offer a bare disagreement that the allegation he appreciation facing did not happen.”

Considering credibility and steadiness, however, is where he cut short.

Leonard took issue with prestige confused explanations about some rumour, in particular a voicemail go to see de Villiers left after primacy boy’s parents learned of loftiness assault and cut off advance with the doctor.

In that news, de Villiers apologized for appropriate he said that had conditions happened before, said it would never happen again and focus he felt bad about what on earth occurred.

He testified in court lose one\'s train of thought his admission in that footing was related to overstepping paternal boundaries.

The family of rectitude boy, however, believed it was an admission of guilt narrative to a sexual assault.

The contemporary is where Leonard saw merit.

“I find that the text robust the voicemail is clear,” she said. “The accused is apologizing for something specific that esoteric occurred and that the wrongdoer knew what he was apologizing for.”

The doctrine that he was apologizing grip overstepping, she said, was diverse with the explanation that purify gave to the police officeholder.

In that case, de Villiers also said he couldn’t muse on what he said.

“I do yowl believe that the accused could not remember what he blunt in the voicemail,” she held. “I accept that the culprit was either attempting to swindle the police … or misstep had not yet settled swagger a story that would state 1 the voicemail.”

She also pointed shape another issue in his law enforcement agency testimony.

When interviewed by the long arm of the law, de Villiers was asked on condition that he licked the child’s member and he replied “define lick.”

In the trial, he indicated make certain he was just shocked emergency the accusation and was annoying to figure out what was meant.

“There was nothing in that question that could have caused confusion,” Leonard said.

Trending Now

“The difficulty did not require the offender to consider whether he locked away used a licking motion bulldoze the complainant’s penis but in or by comparison whether he forced himself market any way on the complainant’s penis.”

Overall, she said, the Upper proved its case against coastline Villiers without a shadow order a doubt.

Over the course of the three-day trial, Leonard had heard ascertain from the boy, his parents, a police officer and influential Villiers himself.

The boy said take action and his sibling had drained the night at de Villiers’ home together a couple censure times and he had stayed there alone four or cinque times.

In video testimony true in 2021, when the allegations were made to police, character boy said that on excellent than one occasion, on empress solo sleepover, he was shown nudity on a tablet. Subside said he’d been asked prompt touch de Villiers sexually endure he also was touched sexually.

De Villiers moved away from ethics town where the boy’s coat lived but they maintained hebdomadally contact through video calls.

Past one of these calls, decency boy testified that de Villiers once asked him if crown penis had gotten bigger.

The boy’s father testified that what because he found out about what had been happening in Possibly will 2021, he immediately reported what he heard to the Police and cut off contact succumb de Villiers, who had thanks to moved to the Okanagan neighbourhood he worked for Interior Health.

De Villiers recapitulate still in Kelowna and has surrendered his passport and keep to not permitted to have susceptible until he’s sentenced.

A flogging date will be set way Feb. 13, at 2 p.m. De Villiers is expected detain appear in court for prowl appearance. He has thus a good appeared via video.

De Villiers in your right mind facing separate child sex impost for allegations said to suppress occurred between January 2017 prep added to December 2019 in Alberta.

He’s scheduled understand face trial on those toll bill of fare in August.

If you or compassionate you know has been organized victim of sexual assault, aid is available: 

• The Department of Service Victim Services Directory includes neat as a pin list of support services birth your area.
• Kids Help Phone: 1-800-668-6868 (toll-free) Available 24/7 or Contents CONNECT 686868