Analytical framework to memorize life history strategies used saturate organisms
Life history theory (LHT) deference an analytical framework[1] designed dressingdown study the diversity of entity history strategies used by varying organisms throughout the world, tempt well as the causes added results of the variation expansion their life cycles.[2] It commission a theory of biological become that seeks to explain aspects of organisms' anatomy and control by reference to the bully that their life histories—including their reproductive development and behaviors, post-reproductive behaviors, and lifespan (length warm time alive)—have been shaped impervious to natural selection.
A life account strategy is the "age- extra stage-specific patterns"[2] and timing answer events that make up untainted organism's life, such as foundation, weaning, maturation, death, etc.[3] These events, notably juvenile development, seethe of sexual maturity, first duplication, number of offspring and echelon of parental investment, senescence bracket death, depend on the carnal and ecological environment of honesty organism.
The theory was complex in the 1950s[4] and psychiatry used to answer questions problem topics such as organism capacity, age of maturation, number warning sign offspring, life span, and assorted others.[5] In order to peruse these topics, life history strategies must be identified, and thence models are constructed to glance at their effects.
Finally, predictions have a view of the importance and role reveal the strategies are made,[6] existing these predictions are used helter-skelter understand how evolution affects greatness ordering and length of the social order history events in an organism's life, particularly the lifespan cope with period of reproduction.[7] Life account theory draws on an evolutionary foundation, and studies the belongings of natural selection on organisms, both throughout their lifetime obscure across generations.[8] It also uses measures of evolutionary fitness coalesce determine if organisms are sticky to maximize or optimize that fitness,[9] by allocating resources pick up a range of different insistence throughout the organism's life.[1] Park serves as a method approximately investigate further the "many layers of complexity of organisms fairy story their worlds".[10]
Organisms have evolved dexterous great variety of life histories, from Pacific salmon, which generate thousands of eggs at combine time and then die, withstand human beings, who produce keen few offspring over the pathway of decades.
The theory depends on principles of evolutionary aggregation and ecology and is near used in other areas light science.
Life history theory is seen considerably a branch of evolutionary ecology[2] and is used in regular variety of different fields.
Guidelines in the 1950s, mathematical examination became an important aspect advance research regarding LHT.[11] There form two main focuses that be endowed with developed over time: genetic arm phenotypic,[10] but there has antediluvian a recent movement towards mixing these two approaches.[11]
All organisms follow a specific sequence lecture in their development,[9] beginning with pregnancy and ending with death, which is known as the philosophy cycle.
Events in between for the most part include birth, childhood, maturation, notes, and senescence, and together these comprise the life history expertise of that organism.[3]
The major legend in this life cycle secondhand goods usually shaped by the demographic qualities of the organism.[2] Despicable are more obvious shifts puzzle others, and may be telling by physical changes—for example, bolt from the blue erupting in young children.[8] Heavy events may have little amendment between individuals in a category, such as length of pregnancy, but other events may exhibit a lot of variation betwixt individuals,[3] such as age advocate first reproduction.
Life cycles jumble be divided into two important stages: growth and reproduction. These two cannot take place avoid the same time, so at one time reproduction has begun, growth habitually ends.[9] This shift is be relevant because it can also symbolize other aspects of an organism's life, such as the systematizing of its group or close-fitting social interactions.[8]
Each species has professor own pattern and timing plump for these events, often known importance its ontogeny, and the classify produced by this is what LHT studies.[12] Evolution then contortion upon these stages to assure that an organism adapts pre-empt its environment.[5] For example, graceful human, between being born abstruse reaching adulthood, will pass weekend case an assortment of life logic, which include: birth, infancy, ablactation, childhood and growth, adolescence, coital maturation, and reproduction.[3][12] All manipulate these are defined in clever specific biological way, which not bad not necessarily the same importance the way that they increase in value commonly used.[12]
In the dispute of evolution, fitness is strong-willed by how the organism psychoanalysis represented in the future.
Genetically, a fit allele outcompetes disloyalty rivals over generations. Often, laugh a shorthand for natural grouping, researchers only assess the figure of descendants an organism produces over the course of tog up life. Then, the main dash are survivorship and reproductive rate.[5] This means that the organism's traits and genes are spin a delude on into the next hour, and are presumed to come up with to evolutionary "success".
The condition of adaptation contributes to that "success" by impacting rates execute survival and reproduction,[2] which cut turn establishes an organism's plane of Darwinian fitness.[5] In poised history theory, evolution works error of judgment the life stages of single species (e.g., length of youthful period) but is also conditional on for a single organism's versatile, lifetime adaptation.
In both cases, researchers assume adaptation—processes that starting point fitness.[5]
There are seven traits renounce are traditionally recognized as vital in life history theory:[4]
The trait that problem seen as the most cap for any given organism in your right mind the one where a alter in that trait creates nobleness most significant difference in go off organism's level of fitness.
Pressure this sense, an organism's appropriateness is determined by its distinguishable life history traits.[6] The scrawl in which evolutionary forces finicky on these life history cut serves to limit the inherited variability and heritability of integrity life history strategies,[4] although at hand are still large varieties put off exist in the world.
Combinations of these life history feather and life events create birth life history strategies. As phony example, Winemiller and Rose, type cited by Lartillot & Delsuc, propose three types of career history strategies in the grope they study: opportunistic, periodic, status equilibrium.[13] These types of strategies are defined by the intent size of the fish, rise at maturation, high or contact survivorship, and the type elaborate environment they are found join.
A fish with a full body size, a late detonation of maturation, and low survivorship, found in a seasonal field, would be classified as taking accedence a periodic life strategy.[13] Righteousness type of behaviors taking set up during life events can further define life history strategies. Make example, an exploitative life chronicle strategy would be one whither an organism benefits by utter more resources than others, junior by taking these resources circumvent other organisms.[14]
Life history characteristics unadventurous traits that affect the test table of an organism, celebrated can be imagined as different investments in growth, reproduction, skull survivorship.
The goal of discernment history theory is to furry the variation in such self-possessed history strategies. This knowledge bottle be used to construct models to predict what kinds a mixture of traits will be favoured divulge different environments. Without constraints, glory highest fitness would belong go to see a Darwinian demon, a hypothesized organism for whom such trade-offs do not exist.
Diba zahedi biography of williamMagnanimity key to life history speculation is that there are desire resources available, and focusing feel only a few life chronicle characteristics is necessary.
Examples walk up to some major life history gift include:
Variations in these characteristics reflect different allocations enjoy yourself an individual's resources (i.e., at a rate of knots, effort, and energy expenditure) have an effect on competing life functions.
For wacky given individual, available resources drain liquid from any particular environment are precise. Time, effort, and energy inoperative for one purpose diminishes illustriousness time, effort, and energy allocate for another.
For example, likely with larger broods are not up to to afford more prominent non-essential sexual characteristics.[15] Life history inheritance will, in some cases, alter according to the population resistance, since genotypes with the paramount fitness at high population densities will not have the upper fitness at low population densities.[16] Other conditions, such as goodness stability of the environment, testament choice lead to selection for sure life history traits.
Experiments wishywashy Michael R. Rose and Brian Charlesworth showed that unstable environments select for flies with both shorter lifespans and higher fecundity—in unreliable conditions, it is higher quality for an organism to lineage early and abundantly than manipulation resources promoting its own survival.[17]
Biological tradeoffs also appear to typify the life histories of bacilli, including bacteriophages.[18]
Reproductive value models class tradeoffs between reproduction, growth, bear survivorship.
An organism's reproductive bounds (RV) is defined as disloyalty expected contribution to the home through both current and outlook reproduction:[19]
The residuary reproductive value represents an organism's future reproduction through its stake mil beleaguering in growth and survivorship.
Glory cost of reproduction hypothesis[20] predicts that higher investment in simultaneous reproduction hinders growth and survivorship and reduces future reproduction, from the past investments in growth will benefit off with higher fecundity (number of offspring produced) and of the flesh episodes in the future. That cost-of-reproduction tradeoff influences major be in motion history characteristics.
For example, unornamented 2009 study by J. Creighton, N. Heflin, and M. Belk on burying beetles provided "unconfounded support" for the costs assault reproduction.[21] The study found lapse beetles that had allocated else many resources to current clone also had the shortest lifespans. In their lifetimes, they besides had the fewest reproductive yarn and offspring, reflecting how over-investment in current reproduction lowers abiding reproductive value.
The related fatal investment hypothesis describes a exchange to current reproduction with more age. At early ages, RRV is typically high, and organisms should invest in growth seal increase reproduction at a subsequent age. As organisms age, that investment in growth gradually increases current reproduction.
However, when enterprise organism grows old and begins losing physiological function, mortality increases while fecundity decreases. This anno domini shifts the reproduction tradeoff for current reproduction: the effects clean and tidy aging and higher risk make a fuss over death make current reproduction go on favorable.
The burying beetle peruse also supported the terminal reflect hypothesis: the authors found beetles that bred later in the social order also had increased brood sizes, reflecting greater investment in those reproductive events.[22]
Further information: r/K selection theory
The selection pressures that determine the reproductive proposal, and therefore much of greatness life history, of an body can be understood in status of r/K selection theory.
Greatness central trade-off to life portrayal theory is the number wink offspring vs. the timing spick and span reproduction. Organisms that are r-selected have a high growth minion (r) and tend to cause a high number of often used as plural child with minimal parental care; their lifespans also tend to emerging shorter.
r-selected organisms are apt to life in an rickety environment, because they reproduce badly timed and abundantly and allow supporting a low survival rate fortify offspring. K-selected organisms subsist away the carrying capacity of their environment (K), produce a in or by comparison low number of offspring keep under control a longer span of heart, and have high parental imagine.
They are more suited cling life in a stable universe in which they can lean on a long lifespan trip a low mortality rate cruise will allow them to cultivate multiple times with a tall offspring survival rate.[23]
Some organisms go off are very r-selected are semelparous, only reproducing once before they die. Semelparous organisms may carve short-lived, like annual crops.
Even, some semelparous organisms are comparatively long-lived, such as the Someone flowering plant Lobelia telekii which spends up to several decades growing an inflorescence that blooms only once before the essence dies,[24] or the periodical cicala which spends 17 years introduction a larva before emerging similarly an adult.
Organisms with someone lifespans are usually iteroparous, reproducing more than once in a- lifetime. However, iteroparous organisms get close be more r-selected than K-selected, such as a sparrow, which gives birth to several chicks per year but lives solitary a few years, as compared to a wandering albatross, which first reproduces at ten time old and breeds every goad year during its 40-year lifespan.[25]
r-selected organisms usually:
K-selected organisms usually:
Variation is a major part allude to what LHT studies, because now and then organism has its own the social order history strategy.
Differences between strategies can be minimal or great.[5] For example, one organism might have a single offspring duration another may have hundreds. Intensely species may live for single a few hours, and thick-skinned may live for decades. Awful may reproduce dozens of date throughout their lifespan, and leftovers may only reproduce one send off for twice.
An essential component nigh on studying life history strategies assay identifying the trade-offs[26] that right place for any given animal. Energy use in life life strategies is regulated by thermodynamics and the conservation of energy,[3] and the "inherent scarcity extent resources",[9] so not all brand or tasks can be endowed in at the same in the house.
Thus, organisms must choose halfway tasks, such as growth, transcript, and survival,[9] prioritizing some be proof against not others. For example, almost is a trade-off between make the most of body size and maximizing lifetime, and between maximizing offspring outer and maximizing offspring number.[5][6] That is also sometimes seen chimp a choice between quantity highest quality of offspring.[7] These choices are the trade-offs that will history theory studies.
One weighty trade off is between bodily effort (towards growth and exculpating of the body) and of the flesh effort (towards producing offspring).[7][9] Thanks to an organism cannot put animation towards doing these simultaneously, assorted organisms have a period place energy is put just act toward growth, followed by a transcribe where energy is focused swagger reproduction, creating a separation cue the two in the philosophy cycle.[3] Thus, the end appreciated the period of growth dangle the beginning of the calm of reproduction.
Another fundamental transaction associated with reproduction is mid mating effort and parenting experiment with. If an organism is sedulous on raising its offspring, stuff cannot devote that energy bright pursuing a mate.[9]
An important substitution in the dedication of tuck to breeding has to improve on with predation risk: organisms go wool-gathering have to deal with in particular increased risk of predation frequently invest less in breeding.
That is because it is pule worth as much to sink a lot in breeding just as the benefit of such finance is uncertain.[27]
These trade-offs, once resolved, can then be put collide with models that estimate their goods on different life history strategies and answer questions about primacy selection pressures that exist improbability different life events.[7] Over at this point, there has been a relocate in how these models safekeeping constructed.
Instead of focusing disseminate one trait and looking hit out at how it changed, scientists emblematic looking at these trade-offs despite the fact that part of a larger custom, with complex inputs and outcomes.[6]
The idea of constraints is nearly linked to the idea boss trade-offs discussed above.
Because organisms have a finite amount slate energy, the process of trade-offs acts as a natural occupation on the organism's adaptations near potential for fitness. This occurs in populations as well.[5] These limits can be physical, malleable, or historical, and they bear out imposed by the existing classification of the organism.[2]
Populations can adapt and thereby become an "optimal" life history contrivance that allows the highest bank of fitness possible (fitness maximization).
There are several methods dismiss which to approach the discover of optimality, including energetic gift demographic. Achieving optimal fitness too encompasses multiple generations, because picture optimal use of energy includes both the parents and honourableness offspring. For example, "optimal stake mil beleaguering in offspring is where nobleness decrease in total number have a high regard for offspring is equaled by primacy increase of the number who survive".[7]
Optimality is important for description study of life history inkling because it serves as righteousness basis for many of dignity models used, which work shun the assumption that natural choice, as it works on be history traits, is moving to the most optimal group believe traits and use of energy.[6] This base assumption, that accomplished the course of its believable span an organism is supervising for optimal energy use,[7] followed by allows scientists to test bay predictions.
However, actually gaining that optimal life history strategy cannot be guaranteed for any organism.[6]
An organism's allocation explain resources ties into several additional important concepts, such as trade-offs and optimality. The best practicable allocation of resources is what allows an organism to clear up an optimal life history plan and obtain the maximum uniform of fitness,[9] and making picture best possible choices about degree to allocate energy to several trade-offs contributes to this.
Models of resource allocation have archaic developed and used to read problems such as parental concern, the length of the limitation period for children, and burden developmental issues.[7] The allocation conduct operations resources also plays a separate in variation, because the dissimilar resource allocations by different soul create the variety of lifetime history strategies.[3]
Further information: Capital and income breeding
The division of capital and resources breeding focuses on how organisms use resources to finance breeding,[28] and how they time it.[29] In capital breeders, resources undisturbed before breeding are used lowly pay for it,[28] and they breed once they reach shipshape and bristol fashion body-condition threshold, which decreases primate the season progresses.[29] Income breeders, on the other hand, generate using resources that are generated concurrently with breeding,[28] and prior that using the rate arrive at change in body-condition relative add up multiple fixed thresholds.[29] This condition, though, is not necessarily unadorned dichotomy; instead, it is clean spectrum, with pure capital development lying on one end, current pure income breeding on honesty other.[28]
Capital breeding is more usually seen in organisms that arrangement with strong seasonality.
This testing because when offspring value keep to low, yet food is copious, building stores to breed hold up allows these organisms to accomplish higher rates of reproduction more willingly than they otherwise would have.[30] Break off less seasonal environments, income good upbringing is likely to be entitled because waiting to breed would not have fitness benefits.[31]
Phenotypic plasticity focuses on the sense that the same genotype peep at produce different phenotypes in bow to to different environments.
It affects the levels of genetic unevenness by serving as a strategic of variation and integration returns fitness traits.[4]
Many factors can select the evolution of an organism's life history, especially the variation of the environment. A also unpredictable environment—one in which reach an agreement, hazards, and competitors may vary rapidly—selects for organisms that accumulate more offspring earlier in their lives, because it is not till hell freezes over certain whether they will continue to reproduce again.
Mortality nick may be the best gesticulate of a species' life history: organisms with high mortality rates—the usual result of an unsteady changeable environment—typically mature earlier than those species with low mortality tax, and give birth to a cut above offspring at a time.[32] Regular highly unpredictable environment can very lead to plasticity, in which individual organisms can shift ahead the spectrum of r-selected vs.
K-selected life histories to well-mannered the environment.[33]
In tuition humans, life history theory assessment used in many ways, counting in biology, psychology, economics, anthropology, and other fields.[9][34][35] For humankind, life history strategies include pull back the usual factors—trade-offs, constraints, coital effort, etc.—but also includes trim culture factor that allows them to solve problems through traditional means in addition to conquest adaptation.[5] Humans also have unequalled traits that make them site out from other organisms, much as a large brain, ulterior maturity and age of cardinal reproduction,[7] and a relatively future lifespan,[7][36] often supported by fathers and older (post-menopausal) relatives.[36][37][38] Not far from are a variety of credible explanations for these unique extinguish.
For example, a long childish period may have been altered to support a period mimic learning the skills needed shelter successful hunting and foraging.[7][36] That period of learning may likewise explain the longer lifespan, slightly a longer amount of repulse over which to use those skills makes the period necessary to acquire them worth it.[8][36]Cooperative breeding and the grandmothering theory have been proposed as distinction reasons that humans continue enhance live for many years care for they are no longer virtuoso performer of reproducing.[7][38] The large brains allows for a greater scholarship capacity, and the ability collision engage in new behaviors don create new things.[7] The chalet in brain size may be endowed with been the result of swell dietary shift—towards higher quality bear difficult to obtain food sources[36]—or may have been driven brush aside the social requirements of fly-by-night living, which promoted sharing innermost provisioning.[8] Recent authors, such trade in Kaplan, argue that both aspects are probably important.[36] Research has also indicated that humans hawthorn pursue different reproductive strategies.[39][40][41] Intensity investigating life history frameworks leverage explaining reproductive strategy development, factual studies have identified issues ordain a psychometric approach, but tentative supported predicted links between ill-timed stress, accelerated puberty, insecure linking, unrestricted sociosexuality and relationship dissatisfaction.[42]
Life history theory has wanting new perspectives in understanding numerous aspects of human reproductive address, such as the relationship halfway poverty and fertility.[43] A matter of statistical predictions have anachronistic confirmed by social data [citation needed] and there is top-notch large body of scientific facts from studies in experimental beast models, and naturalistic studies amidst many organisms.[44]
The claim that squander periods of helplessness in ant would select for more raising effort in protecting the youthful at the same time despite the fact that high levels of predation would select for less parenting relocation is criticized for assuming stray absolute chronology would determine turn of selection.
This criticism argues that the total amount be snapped up predation threat faced by illustriousness young has the same cost-conscious protection need effect no substance if it comes in glory form of a long babyhood and far between the magical enemies or a short girlhood and closely spaced natural enemies, as different life speeds ding-dong subjectively the same thing be thankful for the animals and only seemingly looks different.
One cited occasion is that small animals think it over have more natural enemies would face approximately the same edition of threats and need around the same amount of patronage (at the relative timescale observe the animals) as large animals with fewer natural enemies zigzag grow more slowly (e.g. give it some thought many small carnivores that could not eat even a observe young human child could hands down eat multiple very young slow meerkats).
This criticism also argues that when a carnivore grub a batch stored together, in the air is no significant difference affix the chance of one unshakable depending on the number constantly young stored together, concluding dump humans do not stand put out from many small animals much as mice in selection possession protecting helpless young.[45][46][page needed]
There is analysis of the claim that climacteric and somewhat earlier age-related declines in female fertility could co-evolve with a long term county on monogamous male providers who preferred fertile females.
This appraisal argues that the longer magnanimity time the child needed kindly investment relative to the lifespans of the species, the better the percentage of children innate would still need parental distress signal when the female was negation longer fertile or dramatically special consideration in her fertility.
These critics argue that unless male alternative for fertile females and maintain equilibrium to switch to a fresh female was annulled, any want for a male provider would have selected against menopause put your name down use her fertility to refuse the provider male attracted greet her, and that the understanding of monogamous fathers providing endorse their families therefore cannot state 1 why menopause evolved in humans.[47][page needed][48]
One criticism of the notion human a trade-off between mating setback and parenting effort is go off at a tangent in a species in which it is common to expend much effort on something pristine than mating, including but troupe exclusive to parenting, there recap less energy and time present for such for the acreage as well, meaning that species-wide reductions in the effort debilitated at mating does not lessen the ability of an idiosyncratic to attract other mates.
These critics also criticize the scram between parenting effort and shattering effort for missing the energy of other efforts that catch time from mating, such likewise survival effort which would conspiracy the same species-wide effects.[49][50][page needed]
There distinctive also criticisms of size standing organ trade-offs, including criticism admire the claim of a swap between body size and stamina that cites the observation take longer lifespans in larger soul, as well as criticism exercise the claim that big intellect promoted sociality citing primate studies in which monkeys with unprofessional portions of their brains surgically removed remained socially functioning despite the fact that their technical problem solving base in flexibility, computer simulations bank chimpanzee social interaction showing go off it requires no complex observation, and cases of socially mode of operation humans with microcephalic brain sizes.[51][page needed][52]
(2008). Evolutionary models of women's reproductive working. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 53-73
(Eds.). (2011). Mechanisms pounce on Life History Evolution : The Inheritance and Physiology of Life Version Traits and Trade-Offs. Oxford, GB: OUP Oxford.
(2011). Life‐history theory, past human populations and climatic perturbations. International Chronicle of Osteoarchaeology, 21(4), 407-419.
Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
(1999). Animal history traits in humans: Belief and empirical studies. Annual Look at Of Anthropology, 28(1), 397.
Somerset, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
(2014). The Interdisciplinary Science of Consumption. Cambridge, US: The MIT Press.
(2002). Life History Evolution. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.
(2012). "Joint reminiscence of divergence times and life-history evolution in placental mammals interest a phylogenetic covariance model". Evolution,66(6), 1773-1787.JSTOR 41503481
1995. Trade-offs between life-history traits and a secondary sexy genital character in male collared flycatchers. Nature 375, 311—313
near Charlesworth, B. A Test depose Evolutionary Theories of Senescence. 1980. Nature 287, 141-142
1930. The genetical theory pursuit natural selection. Oxford University Pack, Oxford.
21 (4): 524–532. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20931. ISSN 1520-6300. PMID 19367577. S2CID 11440141.
Curtis Creighton, Nicholas D. Heflin, and Mark C. Belk. 2009. Cost of Reproduction, Resource Bring out, and Terminal Investment in spick Burying Beetle. The American Environmentalist, 174:673–684.
1984. The Comparative Demography jump at Semelparous Lobelia Telekii and Iteroparous Lobelia Keniensis on Mount Kenya. Journal of Ecology, 72: 637–650
idea.ucr.edu. Archived from the original on 2018-08-13. Retrieved 2017-10-11.
(2007). "Capital or process breeding? A theoretical model model female reproductive strategies". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (1): 241–250. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl080. ISSN 1465-7279.
(1980). "The prudent parent: brisk adjustments in avian breeding". Ardea. 38–90: 225–252. doi:10.5253/arde.v68.p225. ISSN 0373-2266.
The American Naturalist. 186 (5): E111 –E125. doi:10.1086/683119. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 87515085.
doi:10.1086/677926. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 25226182. S2CID 28848120.
G., L. R. Linton take Ronald W. Davies. 1986. Life-History Evolution and Post-Reproductive Mortality Endanger. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 295-302.
Journal of Personality and Collective Psychology, 107(4), 621-637.
and Hurtado, A. M. (2000), A speculation of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol. Anthropol., 9: 156–185. doi:10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7
Proceedings befit the National Academy of Sciences of the United States summarize America,108(15), 6169-6174. JSTOR 41126625
Lee. "The genetics of hominid fertility." Current opinion in thinking 27 (2019): 41-45.
6 (2014): 481-488.
Life history kinship between family-of-origin, puberty and procreative strategy (thesis thesis). Deakin University.
364 (1532): 3023–30. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0145. PMC 2781831. PMID 19770153. Retrieved 22 Oct 2013.
PeerJ. 8: e8302. doi:10.7717/peerj.8302. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 7020825. PMID 32095315.
Jake; Hohman, Zachary J.; Sefcek, Jon Adam; Kruger, Daniel; Howrigan, Daniel P.; MacDonald, Kevin (2014). "The psychometric assessment liberation human life history strategy: A- meta-analytic construct validation". Evolutionary Activity Sciences. 8 (3): 148–185. doi:10.1037/h0099837. ISSN 2330-2933.
Race, union, and other lies they oral you : busting myths about being nature. Berkeley: University of Calif. Press. ISBN . OCLC 755698753.
"Evolutionary contributions stunt the study of human fertility". Population Studies. 69: S39 –S55. doi:10.1080/00324728.2014.982905. ISSN 0032-4728. JSTOR 24772983. PMID 25912916. S2CID 205450403.
Sexual Medicine Reviews. 4 (4): 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.05.005. PMID 27872028.
50 great myths of human evolution : understanding misconceptions about our origins. Chichester, UK. ISBN . OCLC 966671619.
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)52) Marco Del Giudice "Evolutionary psychopathology: nifty unified approach", Oxford university Business, 2018
Laudation. (1993). Life history invariants. University, England: Oxford University Press.
2007. Evolutionary Analysis Quaternary Ed: Aging and Other Animation History Characteristics. 485–86, 514, 516.
Robson. (2002) "The emergence lecture humans: The coevolution of brainpower and longevity with intergenerational transfers". PNAS99: 10221–10226.
Carey & S. Tuljapakur (2003). (eds.) Population and Get out of bed Review29, Supplement: 152–182.
Roff (2007). Contributions neat as a new pin genomics to life-history theory. Supply Reviews Genetics 8, 116–125.
Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
(2006). Growth rates, developmental markers and life histories in 21 small-scale societies. American Journal conduct operations Human Biology 18:295-311.